It's that festive time of the year again and it's time to take a break from blogging. I'll be back here early in the New Year. In the meantime, I hope you enjoy the season and I'll see you again in January.
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year |
I just discovered that Windows 11 has a magnifier function that you can enable under Settings > Accessibility. Once enabled, you open it with the Windows Key + Plus Key combination.
By default, it gives you a 200% magnification of the full screen. I don't usually need that much so I have set it to 150%. You can set it to magnify an area around the mouse cursor if you prefer. I now have it set to turn on when I log in and have pinned it to my taskbar.
Full details on all of the Magnifier settings are on the Microsoft website.
Links to things I found interesting but didn't want to do a full blog post about.
Birds on ice |
Here's a seasonal picture for the week. We have had a very mild run up to winter so with only a dusting of snow and temperatures several degrees above normal. That hasn't stopped people from setting up displays for Christmas. I'll have to come by at night to see if they light it up. Taken with my Pixel 8 Pro.
Getting ready for Christmas |
The Kensington Market were a Toronto band that released two superb albums in the late 1960s. From Wikipedia:
Named after a downtown Toronto neighbourhood, it was known for 'gentle, lyrical, rock music', masterful musicianship, and for being was one of the first Canadian rock bands to develop a style independent of US and British models
Their music is somewhat psychedelic, guitar-driven rock with great vocals. The group had middling success but lack of record company promotion and bad lifestyle choices shut down their career after the second album.
The albums are long out of print but Spotify has them and they are most definitely worth a listen.
I saw them perform twice, once in Sault Ste. Marie in 1968 or thereabouts, and at a reunion gig in Hugh's Room in Toronto in 2010. Much to my surprise, the Hugh's Room gig that I attended and a previous one were recorded and are up on the band's YouTube channel. I'm including a few of those videos here as well.
Links to things I found interesting but didn't want to do a full blog post about.
TGull on a post |
The Searchers are a British Merseybeat group who had a several hits, including "Needles and Pins" and "Love Potion Number 9", in the 1960s. I saw them in the later 1970s, when they were on a comeback tour, and quite enjoyed them. Their 1979 album, The Searchers, is a classic example of guitar-driven, melodic British pop. It's still quite listenable, as is the 1980 follow-up, Love's Melodies.
This post is a collection of links that support my increasingly strong feeling that the human race (or at least our technological civilization) is doomed. (And based on the results of last month's US election, probably sooner than I originally thought). It is part of an ongoing series of posts.
Movies and TV shows that Nancy and I watched in November. I do these posts mainly so I can keep track of what we've been watching, so the reviews are cursory.
Links to things I found interesting but didn't want to do a full blog post about.
Creepy Christmas yard ornaments |
This week's photo is of a neighbour's maple tree that overshadows our backyard. All of the leaves have finally fallen and I find myself fascinated by the fractal patterns of the branches reaching for sunlight. Taken with my Pixel 8 Pro. I was tempted to dump it into Photoshop to remove the cable and power lines but I'm too lazy.
Reach for the sky |
The last decade has felt a little aimless for the band: albums and EPs like Constellation Prize, Ghost Dragon Attacks Castle, Gathering, and How the West Was One are solid albums with memorable tracks, but they never quite captured me as with Indian Summer or Love Loss Hope Repeat. That's why Time Is The Playground really struck me as something special: it feels like all of the band's strengths have come together into one sleek, entrancing package that I've had on repeat for weeks. It's an album that covers a range of familiar themes: the passage of time, memory, and of the various stages of one's relationships.
I can't say anything more than that other than I like the album and will be checking out the rest of Carbon Leaf's catalogue.
So the prime minister has made an unannounced trip to Mar-a-Lago to kiss the new leader-of-the-free-world's ass ring. We'll see how that goes.
If you want a better idea of the new order and how it will affect Canada, read this article. Here's a relevant quote.
"But that environment is changing. I quipped with my colleague Jen that Canadians are penguins now being beamed via a Star Trek-style transporter from our comfortable Antarctic home directly into the Amazon. This is not the geopolitical environment in which we have adapted to thrive. And much like those penguins beamed right into the rainforest, a lot of our leaders right now — the prime minister, most of his cabinet, the premiers — are still stuck in the stage of looking around at all the tropical foliage and wondering, whoa. What the hell is going on? And why is it so hot?!"
Today’s piece is a bit of Tariffs 101, with a focus on how the proposed taxes would affect trade with our three largest trading partners. I’ll first cover what Trump announced and the reasons he gave for why, addressing his threats on our neighbors and also on China. We’ll pay some close attention to Trump’s specific language because that could shape the course of events to come.
Second, I’ll address the question, “Can Trump really do that?” The short answer is “yes” but there is a longer discussion to be had around whether the tariffs would be reversed, particularly because they would violate the plain terms of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) that Trump himself negotiated and signed.
Third, I’ll discuss the broad impact such high tariffs would have upon our economy and which sectors might feel the immediate effect. Sadly, consumers wary of higher prices aren’t going to like the answers.
Lastly, I’ll peer inside the muddled mind of the president-elect and posit a few theories about what he’s up to and where this is headed, using past behavior and outcomes as a guide. I’ll show how Trump’s attempt to bludgeon his way into getting what he wants won’t necessarily work this time and will carry longer term consequences that will be difficult to shake.
And from Canada's The Globe and Mail, As Trump pledges tariffs, here are five things we know so far (gift link):
For Canada, which sends more than 77 per cent of its exports to the U.S., the tariffs would represent an economic blow and threaten a recession, with the oil and auto industries particularly affected. For U.S. consumers, who would pay the cost of the tariffs, they would mean punishing price increases.
For Mr. Trump, the tariffs combine two of his foundational political issues: building protectionist trade barriers around the U.S. economy and hardening the country’s borders against migrants.
And finally, from the CBC, How Canada can hit the U.S. where it hurts in fight against Trump's tariffs.
If Canada seeks to retaliate over U.S. president-elect Donald Trump's tariff threat, the government should hit the U.S. where it would hurt economically and politically, some trade experts suggest.
The challenge would be to "find some iconic U.S. item … that would resonate with Trump's supporters, or the constituencies he cares about, which if Canada put tariffs on them, it will get a lot of notice in the U.S," said Gary Hufbauer, a non-resident senior fellow at Peterson Institute for International Economics.
Trump has threatened to impose 25 per cent tariffs on Canadian and Mexican goods unless both governments tighten their borders to prevent the flow of drugs like fentanyl and illegal migrants into the U.S. But his threat has raised questions as to whether Canada has any kind of leverage to squeeze the U.S. and prevent such tariff action.
"It's unclear what Canada can do going forward," wrote Derek Holt, vice-president of Scotiabank Economics, in a note to clients.
Ultimately, he said, Canada may feel it doesn't have any choice left other than to retaliate, and "we need to be prepared for such a risk."
That last article reminds me of the classic 1950s satire, The Mouse That Roared. Hopefully things will turn out as well for Canada as they did for the Duchy of Grand Fenwick.
This is a guest post by Kevin Davies, a writer (prose & songs [300+]), artist, graphic designer, game creator and publisher.
It was originally posted on Kevin Davies' Facebook page and is posted here with his permission. Copyright 2024 by Kevin Davies.
While it might seem outrageous to ask the question, especially just after a US election where voter turnout was reported as “the second-highest in the past century,” (The Washington Post) [1], it does appear that the USA may have reached the point where it has become an open OLIGARCHIC PLUTOCRACY.
The wonderful thing about American democracy (and most others), if you are a corrupt politician, is that you can promise anything, get elected, and then spend at least one term serving the actual interests that paid for your winning.
But also, once in power, it’s much easier to STAY in power — again in part because those ‘interests’ you’ve been serving are going to keep giving you money and other forms of support (e.g., favorable messages on social media and traditional media platforms), doing all they can to ensure they maintain their influence.
Think tank messaging and other ‘educational’ propaganda that ‘mentally capture’ politicians and their supporters make the task of obtaining the desired pro-wealth policies even easier.
While this is something that some reporters have been discussing for decades, the power and influence of the wealthy elite — at least since WWII — has never been so great.
One of the primary reasons for this expansion of power for oligarchs, is a decades long campaign to influence public attitudes to transition from an electorate that wants “What’s best for America,” (i.e., society, which tends to describe ‘the masses’), toward voters who’ve been encouraged to individually demand “What’s in it for ME!” — which suits the wealthy elite fine.
When voters are thinking ONLY ABOUT THEMSELVES, not only does it eliminate any finger-pointing at the wealthy for doing exactly the same — except that they have the clout to actually ensure they get what they want and it’s considered a ‘virtue’ (e.g., tax cuts, deregulation, security, diplomatic influence and military conquest of potential resources and markets, etc.) — but also it means voters can more easily be bought off with lies from candidates and campaign messaging.
When people are only interested in PERSONAL GAIN, and not societal gain, it means that politicians can avoid talking about or meaningfully acting on the things that the society needs to function grow, and maintain.
This includes the basic NECESSITIES for a modern and wealthy democracy such as: infrastructure, regulatory oversight, a functional and fair justice system, health care, education, a social safety net, pensions, and anything a government acting in the service of the masses deems desirable that private investors won’t fund, or are unable to provide on terms that best serve the public (e.g., providing services to less or non-profitable low population and hard to reach rural areas, national security, and many other services that too many fail to recognize until they need them personally) — which also benefits the rich!
The ‘SMALL GOVERNMENT’ view of low taxation and minimum services provision (setting aside the ‘large’ government required to enforce ant-abortion and pro-faith laws), works best for wealthy ideologues — because at least they have the funds to hire private contractors to deliver most desired services (until the economy collapses).
For the rest of society, not so much.
Yet the propaganda of the pioneering ‘INDIVIDUAL’, acting unhindered by government oversight and taxation continues to appeal to those who, for some reason, can never imagine themselves running out of money, becoming sick or dying from toxins in their food and water, or having to exist in a infrastructure decaying, crime-ridden, diseased and dying, environment.
The Mad Max films are better as entertainment than a lifestyle; smaller government means a much smaller population.
These things need to be clearly pointed out and rationally discussed.
In the past, ‘throwing the bums out’ may have had some genuine success, and in select cases, still might prove effective.
However, changing one’s government representative has increasingly become less effective since:
a) elections in many areas are so EXPENSIVE that only candidates backed by corrupting corporate ‘BIG MONEY’ have any hope to win,
b) to obtain that ‘big money’ support, candidates are required to CHANGE which POLICIES they advocate to accommodate a more ‘PRO-WEALTH’, instead of a ‘pro-masses’, stance (note: this is typically called ‘moving to the center’ in the media),
c) an increased number of information sources offer MISINFORMATION, DISINFORMATION, and PROPAGANDA, which manipulate and polarize the public by increasing ignorance, cynicism, uncertainty, distrust, paranoia, and apathy [2], and
d) apathy and disgust with the political process and outcomes has resulted in large numbers of electors NOT PAYING ATTENTION to whether on not politicians actually DELIVER on promises that actually improve their circumstances, whether the outcomes are what was promised, and what any unintended consequences were.
All these factors benefit the wealthy and connected pro-wealth lobbyists promoting a pro-wealth, trickle-down, policies.
Clearly the current behavior of many politicians, academics, and supporters that desire pro-society policies isn’t working. Meanwhile, the strategy used by the wealthy and their pro-wealthy supporters is doing great!
The Democrats (and many supposedly ‘left leaning’ parties in various democracies) have tried to win the support of the wealthy and those demanding “What’s in it for ME!” by moving toward what they perceive to be the ‘CENTER’.
This represents flawed thinking. The ‘center’ is ALWAYS toward the RIGHT — and always toward the interests of the WEALTHY and their supporters (i.e., against the masses and society).
This faulty strategy, widely adopted, has only further reinforced conditions where the wealthy can obtain what they want regardless of who wins, playing one side off the other while smiling all the way to their offshore accounts.
Meanwhile, elected politicians and their supporters that advocate pro-society and pro-masses policies are branded by their opponents — and much of the mainstream media — as ‘too left’, ‘fanatical’, ‘extreme’, ‘crazy’, etc. The reason is because such policies do not serve the interests of the wealthy.
Having heard this nonsense repeated so many times the media (which is OWNED by the wealthy), some academics, and many of the masses, now take these smears as ‘normal’ and truthful, accepting and repeating them as fact.
Even political parties such as the Democrats in the USA have accepted such slurs as something they must accept or run away from, shifting their policies and behavior increasingly, and somewhat suicidally, toward the RIGHT.
This is the aim of the slander and lies!
As long as the electorate is employing a “What’s in it for ME!” transactional attitude toward politics, they can NOT be expected to vote for a candidate or party that wants to make society better for EVERYONE.
Voters have been taught, by pro-wealthy propaganda, to think things such as: “Why should i pay for schools if I don’t have kids?” or “Why should I fund infrastructure, health care treatments, regulations and oversight, etc., that doesn’t appear to DIRECTLY BENEFIT ME?”
This society corroding thinking is the great win of the pro-wealth propaganda effort that began in the 1950’s and has succeeded fantastically with the 2024 election. And the most insidious thing about it is that few people seem aware or find it anything but ‘natural’.
The Republicans, and conservative parties in general, win elections by manipulating and lying to the masses in the service of the wealthy. They tell them what they want to hear, then once elected do nothing, or just enough to be able to claim that they’ve delivered (e.g., build a wall and make Mexico pay!) — so that any supporters not fact-checking will be convinced.
Simultaneously, they implement policies which serve their real constituents — the ones who fund them: the wealthy elite and upper middle classes.
The pro-society, pro-masses parties, candidates, and pundits must become much BETTER COMMUNICATORS, using the people they serve as their lodestar (i.e., if a policy primarily serves the interests of the masses and society, it has merit and is worth defending).
Standing on such principles in the service of society’s interests is the only way to differentiate from pro-wealth parties, candidates, pundits, and supporters.
Language must be employed to CLEARLY and EFFECTIVELY communicate the significant benefits of such policies… REPEATEDLY.
People must be informed to understand that when policies improve the lives of the MANY, each INDIVIDUAL ALSO BENEFITS — even if those benefits don’t appear immediately obvious.
How those “What’s in it for ME!” thinkers benefit from policies that appear to be aimed at others must be clearly and rationally explained to them — using language that they can relate to. They must not be talked down to, or be made to feel insulted, if they initially fail to comprehend — there is a lot of pro-wealth messaging to overcome.
Also, pro-society communicators must STOP ACCEPTING or using TERMS or DEROGATORY EPITHETS that the pro-wealthy employ to criticize or slander them and their policies (e.g., socialist, communist, ignorant, crazy, etc.). They must master and defend the language used (as conservatives have done) so that they CHANGE HOW THE MASSES HEAR AND THUS PERCEIVE their policies.
There are some wise, philanthropic, and pro-society wealthy people out there who will recognize the importance and necessity of a shift in policies toward the masses — even though it may not initially appear to serve their interests (e.g., raising taxes on the wealthy to fund infrastructure; yet, the wealthier one is, the more infrastructure they use).
Such elites must be sought out by party leaders and candidates and won over with reasoned arguments for funding and guidance for this project.
It will not be easy. Most wealthy elites accumulated what they possess by acting only in their self-interest.
Yet it must be done. It is the only way to overcome what is now a government an electorate which has been convinced that “WHAT’S GOOD FOR THE WEALTHY IS GOOD FOR EVERYONE.” It really isn’t.
It will require a huge and focused COMMUNICATIONS EFFORT to INFORM and re-educate the public about who and what policies might BEST SERVE THEM. It will require adopting a LESS DEFERENTIAL attitude toward pro-wealth politicians, media, pundits, and academics.
It will require making choices for the sake of a GREATER GOOD — and not necessarily one’s own long-term political career. It’s a lot to ask. But the benefit will be massive.
Unfortunately, it appears that we’re running out of time to counteract the propaganda poison that has infected democratic systems worldwide and captured minds. Wealth inequality has grown to its highest level since the Gilded Age (1870 to 1900). Countries and leaders are becoming more belligerent.
Yet is seems most have chosen to be willfully blind or have simply accepted it, with little discussion about the implications, or thought to the possibility of rational, peaceful, and productive alternatives.
When the masses are deeply unhappy and losing hope for a better tomorrow — especially while they see and serve others who appear to be doing so much better (e.g., on social media) — they become confused, and begin to loathe their circumstances, themselves… and one another.
As such, they are more likely to embrace ‘quick fixes’ and trust in a populist ‘strong man’ who assures them he can quickly and easily improve things for them.
They become more vulnerable to accepting BAD ECONOMIC POLICIES (e.g., protectionist tariffs causing a reduction in global trade and inflation on imports — including necessities), XENOPHOBIA, a DISTRUST OF DIPLOMATIC to provide solutions, and a tendency toward MILITARISM (remarkably combined with ISOLATIONISM).
They become divided, bitter, callous, transactional, angry, and more vulnerable to being exploited and supporting unreasonable one-sided and FORCE-BASED SOLUTIONS, both domestically and abroad — including being manipulated into sacrificing their lives in the name of political and greedy ambition couched as patriotism.
History rhymes.
— Kevin Davies, November 11, 2024.
------
NOTE:
[1] ARTICLE - 2024 turnout is near the 2020 record. See how each state compares.
[2] ISSUE BRIEF - Distinguishing Disinformation from Propaganda, Misinformation, and “Fake News” (National Endowment for Democracy).
Links to things I found interesting but didn't want to do a full blog post about.
The bay on a grey day |
This week's musical treat is a blast from the past, the Don Ellis Orchestra At Fillmore. Don Ellis was an American trumpeter, bandleader, and composer. I heard music from this album ("Pussy Wiggle Stomp", if memory serves) on Detroit's WABX-FM when I was in university and immediately purchased it to play on my jazz show on the student radio station.
This is highly propulsive, somewhat avant garde, big band jazz. It was recorded at San Francisco's Fillmore Auditorium in 1969. From Wikipedia:
The band's energetic live performances such as the one at Stanford caused its popularity among college crowds to increase. In June 1970, the Orchestra performed for three nights at Bill Graham's Fillmore West auditorium, opening for the Quicksilver Messenger Service and Leon Russell. The resulting recording was made into a double LP and released by Columbia in late 1970. "Live at Fillmore" was a happy return to original material, and even included one Beatles cover, a highly experimental rendition of "Hey Jude", as well as another version of "Pussy Wiggle Stomp".
In listening to it today, I'm struck by how modern it sounds. Also notable is how appreciate the audience at the Fillmore was, considering that big bands weren't the normal fare there. I hope you enjoy it too.
I will never forgive Elon Musk for ruining Twitter, which was an essential service for many people. Twitter is still there, as X, but it's a pale shadow of its former self and has become a cesspit of right-wing and misogynist content, some of it posted by Musk himself.
So what are the alternatives?
There are now three major platforms vying for users.
I'm finding that reading email newsletters is a better use of my time than browsing the web looking for news or especially, analysis of current affairs. (Also better is using an RSS reader like Feedly, but I'll save writing about that for another time).
These are some of the newsletters that I subscribe to. They are all free, though some have a paid tier for more posts or features.
Links to things I found interesting but didn't want to do a full blog post about.
The marina waiting for winter |
Julian Taylor in Greenbank |
And here's a pro-shot video of Julian Taylor playing with his band at Toronto's Winterfolk Festival earlier this year. It's quite lovely.
This post is a collection of links that support my increasingly strong feeling that the human race (or at least our technological civilization) is doomed. (And based on the results of last week's US election, probably sooner than I originally thought). It is part of an ongoing series of posts.
Autumn Leaves |
If you live in the United States, it's a good idea to start thinking about how you can protect yourself from being surveilled by the government.
As Wired Magazine says in their Guide to Protecting Yourself from Government Surveillance:
“Undocumented immigrants, Muslims, pregnant people, journalists, really anyone who doesn't support him” need to reconsider their personal privacy safeguards, says Runa Sandvik, a former digital security staffer for The New York Times and the founder of the security firm Granitt, which focuses on protecting members of civil society. “Whatever platforms you're on, whatever devices you have, you need to have a sense of what kind of data you're generating and then use the controls available to limit who can see what you're doing.”
The guide covers several key areas:
The political news coming out of the United States has been pretty grim in the last week, but there are some silver linings in the dark clouds. In his Tuesday newsletter, Jay Kuo points out that Trump's penchant for appointing sycophants may be threatening a presumable Republican House majority.
If the House race watchers are correct, the GOP may have 220 or 221 House seats in the next session, compared to the Democrats at 215 to 214. That’s already a fairly slim majority, and a defection of three or four members could sink any piece of legislation. We saw that dynamic play out repeatedly over the past two years, resulting in the least productive Congress in recent history.
That’s why analysts like Adam Carlson (and myself) are rather shocked at how many of Trump’s picks for key cabinet or operational positions are being drawn from the ranks of the House Republican Conference. By today’s count, as many as five GOP members could give up their seats if they are nominated and get confirmed by the Senate.
On top of Reps. Waltz and Stefanik, Trump reportedly may tap Rep. Mike Rogers (R-AL) for Secretary of Defense, Rep. Sam Graves (R-MO) for Secretary of Transportation, and Rep. Glenn Thompson (R-PA) for Secretary of Agriculture.
There is even a world in which a 220-215 GOP majority moves this spring to a 215-215 tie.
If all this happens, and while we await special elections, Speaker Johnson might struggle mightily to push any legislation through, assuming he can even re-win the Speakership. Any delay in moving bills along will give Democrats that much more time to rally and lobby against them, particularly if they would strip away healthcare or raise costs on working families or the elderly, and peel off a few GOP swing district members.
We can only hope.
More research is showing that COVID-19 infections can have long-term, subtle, and dangerous effects on the body.
In addition to brain fog, COVID-19 can lead to an array of problems, including headaches, seizure disorders, strokes, sleep problems, and tingling and paralysis of the nerves, as well as several mental health disorders. A large and growing body of evidence amassed throughout the pandemic details the many ways that COVID-19 leaves an indelible mark on the brain. But the specific pathways by which the virus does so are still being elucidated, and curative treatments are nonexistent.
SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, can damage the lungs, heart, brain, kidneys, and blood vessels. Inflammation was first thought to be the main source of this damage. As it became clear that parts of the virus bind to proteins in the mitochondria — the parts of the cell that produce most cellular energy — researchers realized that compromised mitochondria may also play a role in organ damage from SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Both of these articles contain links to various research studies.
Links to things I found interesting but didn't want to do a full blog post about. Sorry for all the politics this week, but I think you can understand why.
Autumn colour contrast |
"This is a fighting prayer for my country." That's how Bruce Springsteen opened his concert in Toronto on November 6th. Backed by the E-Street Band, a horn section, and the "E-Street Choir", and starting more than an hour late due to travel delays, Bruce gave us almost three hours of glorious, joyous, life-affirming music. It brought me to tears of joy several times and I'm sure I wasn't the only one. It's been years since I've had that kind of emotional impact from a concert. In thinking about it later, I realized that there was sadness, pain, and anger in the music, but there was no negativity. The overall feeling was overwhelmingly positive.
The view from the nose bleed seats |
We had seats up in the 300s in the curve of the bowl beside and slightly behind the stage, but the sightlines were good (aided by a large video screen) and the sound was perfect, loud and crisp.
Thank/ you Bruce. I needed an antidote to darkness and you delivered, in spades.
Here are a few audience YouTube videos from the concert, starting with the opening "Long Walk Home" followed by a majestic "Land of Hope and Glory".
Better Days
Reason to Believe
Rosalita
Tenth Avenue Freezeout
I am not optimistic about the near future. There is no scenario in which Trump's election can be considered a good thing. We are in for a period of chaos in disruption in politics, the economy, society, and international relations. What do we do now?
Ken White is a Los Angeles-based lawyer who publishes a blog under the title of "The Popehat Report". His post yesterday is the best thing I've read about Trump's election, what it means for us, and what we can do cope with the coming dark times.
Modernity has spoiled us in thinking things won’t get dramatically and catastrophically worse, worse in a way that will last for generations. But things have gotten abruptly much worse before, and they can again. And yet people must persevere, even if their children and grandchildren who will see the benefits and not them.
Trump won yesterday, as I feared he would. I firmly believe America — and likely the world — will get significantly worse for at least a generation, probably more. I’ll spare you, for now, the why. Frankly, I think you either already accept it or will never accept it. The things I care about, like the rule of law and equality before it, freedom of religion, freedom of speech, free trade in service of free people, relative prosperity, protection of the weak from the strong, truth, and human dignity are all going to suffer. Bullies and their sycophants and apologists will thrive.
What should we do?
I am beyond disappointed. Angry. Scared. But not surprised. It seems like the world is moving in the direction of authoritarianism and the US is just the latest country to fall to this madness.
Most of all, I am sad. Sad for my family members in the US; sad for any Americans who are not CIS, white, and male; sad for Ukraine and other countries struggling for freedom; sad for the planet because there will be no chance of mitigating global warming.
The next four years (at least) are going to be chaotic. I am not looking forward to them.
Links to things I found interesting but didn't want to do a full blog post about.
The future if Trump wins |